I am growing concerned with the volume of likely state-sponsored malware and related attacks1.

I am worried that many nations have legislation allowing them to issue orders or otherwise compromise private endeavor2 and often suppress discussion of these orders with gag orders.3

I am starting to consider the provenance and integrity of my virus scanner to be important.

I would like a virus scanner that:

  1. Has an engine that is routinely scrutinized, and
  2. Has virus definition data that is routinely scrutinized.

I would consider these conditions met if:

  1. The above components are published Open Source, or
  2. Are scrutinized by a trusted digital rights organization like EFF or ORG.

Additional features required:

  1. Support for the Windows operating system.

Desirable features:

  1. Choice of real-time, on-demand or scheduled scanning
  2. Performance characteristics that compare with traditional commercial offerings
  3. Detection characteristics that compare with traditional commercial offerings


1: Attacks such as: CIPAV, Flame, Stuxnet, Mask and recently NSA Radio Hacks.

2: Compromises such as: the Clipper Chip, cryptography export restrictions, and recently PRISM.

3: Gags such as : National security letters e.g Twitter Subpoena



1 Answer 1


ClamAV is Open Source, and I know that researchers and individuals scrutinize its source code.

I don't think any organization is tasked with auditing it on a regular basis, though.

enter image description here

  • That looks a lot fancier than I remember - is that clamwin? Commented Feb 12, 2014 at 11:16
  • 4
    While the ClamAV engine is open source, the windows "download" button on that website links to an installer for the closed source and very cloud-centric Immunet 3 product that also includes the SPERO and ETHOS engines (source). In addition to uploading those files flagged as suspect, it will upload information about the files that exist on your machine, and which files you execute, to centralised servers (source). Commented Feb 13, 2014 at 1:19
  • 2
    @KellyThomas: I was not aware of this, thanks a lot for the information! I will try to update my answer, but don't hesitate to edit it as well!
    – Nicolas Raoul
    Commented Feb 13, 2014 at 2:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.