1

I like WinAmp, I'm used to WinAmp. I'm not saying every single aspect of it is wonderful, but it's gotten enough right to keep me a loyal user.

Now, QMMP - at least on my GNU/Linux Mint 18.3 - has (at least) three annoying bugs/misfeatures:

  • Poor/no support for Unicode in filenames
  • Trouble with minimization/maximization, where only one of the several panes will become visible again, and it's hella difficult to make the others reappear.
  • Lacking higher-resolution skins

So I'm looking for another player. Requirements:

  • WinAmp-like
  • Gratis and libre
  • Actively maintained
  • Doesn't exhibit glaring bugs

Desirable:

  • Multi-file tagging / tag editing capability
  • Ability to rename files by tags and patterns
  • Ability to fix invalid charset use in meta-data fields (essentially applying tr or a regexp to various fields in many files)
  • Different erfrom QMMP/WinAmp in non-intrusive/interesting ways I might appreciate despite my "conservatism"

Undesirable:

  • Trying to be general-purpose media player

PS - If you were to tell me QMMP's trunk is better than what I have installed - I'll take that as one of the possible answers.

  • Did you try Amarok and Clementine? They're the best as far as I know. – onurcano Mar 6 '18 at 18:44
  • @onurcano22: Amarok is really not like WinAmp. Clementine - I remember hearing about it. – einpoklum Mar 6 '18 at 18:48
  • What's wrong with VLC? That said, you might want to look at xmms - it was modeled on WinAmp. Dunno if it really whips a llama's butt though... – ivanivan Jun 6 '18 at 13:11
  • @ivanivan: There's nothing wrong with it, it's just not like WinAmp. – einpoklum Jun 6 '18 at 13:17
2

Audacious is a relatively simple, lightweight audio player - similar in function to WinAmp 2.x. It supports, as an option, using a WinAmp-like skinnable interface:

enter image description here

You can read about it on Wikipedia as well.

It uses the FreeBSD license ("2-clause BSD license"). Hopefully no glaring bugs, and latest release (at the time of writing) in August 2017, so reasonably-actively maintained.

  • Audacious isn't an equivalent to Winamp. – onurcano Mar 7 '18 at 13:16
  • @onurcano22: It's not an equivalent, but its UI is WinAmp-like. But you're very welcome to edit my answer and list some aspects of difference from WinAmp which you think are significant. – einpoklum Mar 7 '18 at 15:20
  • I edited your anwer. – onurcano Mar 9 '18 at 12:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.