I often come across interesting websites while browsing with Firefox. These are sites that I may, or may not, have time to go back to view.

I don't want to add these sites to the regular Firefox bookmarks because then they will appear in the location bar suggestions. (I could turn off bookmarks for location bar suggestions, but I want my regular bookmarks to still appear.)

I wind up just keeping a text file with all these URLs. It gets unmanageable and chaotic very quickly. Plus, cutting and pasting into the file is tedious.

Is there a Firefox extension, or other solution, to have essentially two sets of bookmarks: one that is used by for location bar suggestions, and one that is not.


  • Must be offline (does not store bookmarks "in the cloud")
  • Must handle thousands of bookmarks (acceptable limit is about 5000)
  • Gratis or very low cost
  • Windows compatible

Not needed:

  • Encryption
  • Passwords

Already tried:

  • Save-To-Read - Bookmarks still appear in location bar suggestions. Also difficult to remove bookmarks.
  • I guess ScrapBook will not be the best match, as it stores the entire page instead of just bookmarks? That's the first thing which came to my mind …
    – Izzy
    Commented Nov 7, 2015 at 20:28
  • Why do they need to be bookmarks? What functionality do you need from them? What's wrong with exporting them as urls?
    – user193661
    Commented Nov 7, 2015 at 21:44
  • Is this different from the one you asked before? softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/19821/…
    – user193661
    Commented Nov 7, 2015 at 22:19
  • I forgot about that one... wrote it 6 months ago. :-) This question is similar, but allows for different types of solutions. The functionality of a bookmark must include storing a URL that, when clicked, opens a web site. Commented Nov 7, 2015 at 23:51
  • 1
    @Izzy Thanks Izzy. I'm still undecided. I haven't had a chance to figure out what will work best yet. Commented Mar 12, 2016 at 23:33

1 Answer 1


When I read your requirements correctly, a combination of two Firefox addons could do the job:

Markdown Editor allows you to open/create, edit, and save Markdown documents – using a syntax you're already familiar with from Stack Exchange. This would include e.g. nested lists and hyperlinks:

Markdown Editor Markdown Editor
Markdown Editor (source: Mozilla.org; click images for larger variants)

As the second screenshot shows, the addon's split view feature would allow you to "click" those links. To make "capturing" links easier, I'd recommend a second addon:

CoLT (short for "Copy Link Text") makes it easy to copy either a link's text, or both the link text and its URL in a format you specify. This non-invasive extension simply appears as context menu items when you right-click a link. Fully customizable!

CoLT (source: Mozilla.org; click images for larger variants)

I use CoLT myself for years already – and I use it a lot in a similar way as I'm suggesting here: to insert links into Markdown documents (only that most of those Markdown "documents" are answers on SE sites), so I can at least vouch for this part.


As akavel pointed out in the comments, there's also Easy Copy – which somewhat acts like "CoLT on steroids" (much more configurable and feature rich). Make your own choice here :) For example, with Easy Copy you can configure to get a selected fragment of text from a website into clipboard too, using the following snippet:

* [%page_title%](%page_url%) (%date%)

    > %selection%

Now let's see how my combination matches your requirements:

  • Must be offline (does not store bookmarks "in the cloud"): Check.
  • Must handle thousands of bookmarks (acceptable limit is about 5000): you didn't specify across how many documents they can be split, so: Yes, at least when spread about several documents :) Not sure if the editor has a limit – and if, where it lies.
  • Gratis or very low cost: Gratis, but donations accepted (both addons)
  • Windows compatible: I cannot test that currently – but at least for CoLT the answer is a definitive yes (have used it on Windows already when at my customers' places)
  • The functionality of a bookmark must include storing a URL that, when clicked, opens a web site: Yupp, see "split view".

Conclusion: If it's acceptable to use two addons to accomplish the task, these two should do. If not, CoLT could be substituted by (Easy Copy and/or) additional handiwork :)

  • Thanks Izzy! That's a clever combination. I appreciate it. I'll give it a try and see how it works out. I think the number of clicks and cursor movements could make it a bit cumbersome, but it is definitely worth trying. I'm open to other innovative solutions as well. Commented Nov 9, 2015 at 2:54
  • 1
    It's definitely not as easy as the "usual bookmark manager". But given your requirements, it's hard to find a good fit: bookmark manager either work with the built-in bookmarks, or store in the cloud (e.g. Pocket). I know there's a "bookmarklet" for ownCloud's bookmark app, but installing ownCloud just for that would be a little overkill. What's left requires a few more clicks then – unless someone can automate it somehow. Btw: The above is almost what I do with parts of my bookmarks – only that I use a separate editor ;)
    – Izzy
    Commented Nov 9, 2015 at 7:38
  • Exactly! Right now I've been using a separate editor as well, but it is clunky to switch back and forth, cutting and pasting. Ideally, I would like either (1) something that adds another integrated bookmark system into the browser, or (2) uses the browser's existing bookmarks system and just excludes a few folders from location bar suggestions. Commented Nov 9, 2015 at 17:35
  • Afraid neither 1 nor 2 exist – but I'm gladly taught otherwise.
    – Izzy
    Commented Nov 9, 2015 at 18:26
  • 1
    Instead of CoLT, I found Easy Copy more featureful: I configured it to copy the title+link as a markdown bullet item, and also with the currently selected fragment of the page as a quote,
    – akavel
    Commented Mar 11, 2016 at 18:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.