Timeline for Tool to build websites
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2020 at 20:10 | comment | added | OleVik | One further thing I'd add, which I find helpful, is to consider the licenses and governance-models. The future, and thus long-term stability of a CMS (or other system), depends a lot on its long-term development and maintenance. And without a healthy community, ecosystem, and governance-model, most fall to the wayside. Almost all solo-projects I've come across will fail because of this, but then again, not everything designed by committee works well. Grav has developed well, even without a fully-fledged governance-model, because the core developers are responsive to the community. | |
| Jan 19, 2020 at 20:05 | comment | added | OleVik | The first difference with Bolt I notice is that Bolt requires a database, otherwise the features are quite similar, apart from a few conceptual differences. I'd suggest trying out both to get an idea of what feels right. The reason why there are so many options is that, unlike a decade ago, the amount of stable and well-developed libraries and frameworks abound. This makes it relatively easier for anyone to create a CMS, and use good standards and systems for it. But they remain different, because people disagree on what and how. | |
| Jan 18, 2020 at 21:54 | comment | added | gota | yes, grav stands on top of my list. Bolt looks very similar.. can you comment on the differences to this and other options? and why so many options? wouldn't it be better for everyone if forces are joined? | |
| Jan 18, 2020 at 20:41 | history | edited | OleVik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
English.
|
| Jan 18, 2020 at 20:30 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 23, 2020 at 7:25 | |||||
| Jan 18, 2020 at 20:27 | history | answered | OleVik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |