Timeline for PDF editor with emphasis on Preflight, PDF standards and PDF/X
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2020 at 19:12 | vote | accept | Usor | ||
| Feb 7, 2020 at 19:01 | comment | added | Usor | In fact, PhantomPDF has Preflight options, but is not, as already more or less implied, complete. In fact, on the forum was a message by an official stating that they were going to work on it further. | |
| Feb 7, 2020 at 18:59 | comment | added | Usor | Emphasis on Preflight, Nicolas, means exactly that. I don't see how these words require further explanation. Have you at all used PhantomPDF and looked at the relevant options, or have you lot looked at its manual? | |
| Jan 31, 2020 at 19:51 | comment | added | adamlogan | AFAIK PhantomPDF does not have validation capability at all? If so please point me to a tutorial on how to use it. | |
| Jan 31, 2020 at 19:07 | answer | added | adamlogan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 27, 2019 at 6:16 | comment | added | Nicolas Raoul♦ | Also, what do you mean by "emphasis on Preflight"? Preflight is the name of a specific tool made by Adobe, right? Do you mean that the tool should have a good validator feature? | |
| Dec 27, 2019 at 6:13 | history | edited | Nicolas Raoul♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 26, 2019 at 12:41 | comment | added | Usor | Nothing wrong with PhantomPDF. It is simply incomplete, insufficient or too much behind Adobe's in its Preflight options. | |
| Dec 26, 2019 at 5:26 | history | edited | Nicolas Raoul♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 26, 2019 at 5:26 | comment | added | Nicolas Raoul♦ | Please explain what is wrong with PhantomPDF. | |
| Dec 25, 2019 at 23:00 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 26, 2019 at 9:51 | |||||
| Dec 25, 2019 at 22:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 26, 2019 at 7:41 | |||||
| Dec 25, 2019 at 22:17 | history | asked | Usor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |