Timeline for What software can I use to measure LLOC, function points and cyclomatic complexity of Bash scripts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2020 at 17:22 | answer | added | Koichi Nakashima | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 17, 2016 at 19:31 | vote | accept | Arseni Mourzenko | ||
| Dec 17, 2016 at 7:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftRecs/status/810017219958685696 | ||
| Dec 17, 2016 at 4:04 | answer | added | Ira Baxter | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 22, 2016 at 17:15 | comment | added | Arseni Mourzenko |
@SteveBarnes: while it's slightly more relevant compared to cloc and, more importantly, adds cyclomatic complexity, it lacks LLOC and function points. On the other hand, it's not clear to me if LLOC is really much more relevant than LOC for Bash, and function points may not be relevant either (for instance for large scripts containing no functions). I suggest that we wait for a few days for other answers, and if there are none, close my question as a duplicate.
|
|
| Oct 22, 2016 at 4:53 | comment | added | Steve Barnes | Take a look at softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/36961/… | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 22:32 | history | edited | Arseni Mourzenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 139 characters in body
|
| Oct 21, 2016 at 22:15 | history | asked | Arseni Mourzenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |