Timeline for Command-line tool for lossless JPEG compression and optimization for Ubuntu
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2016 at 15:30 | comment | added | Seb | You can minify the size of JPEGs by removing unneeded metadata, so while the image info might not be compressed, the result is a smaller filesize. | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 12:53 | comment | added | Nemo | JPEG too has a lossless mode, though barely ever used. | |
| Jul 13, 2014 at 22:17 | comment | added | Volker Siegel | @ElliottFrisch No, JPEG with 100% quality is still lossy - SO: Is Jpeg lossless when quality is set to 100?. JPEG2000 has lossy and lossless modes, but that's something different. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 20:00 | comment | added | Elliott Frisch | A JPEG at 100% quality is loss-less. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 10:09 | comment | added | Salvador Dali | Guys, this is a totally wrong answer. Not only it suggests a wrong tool to do the job, it also conveys wrong information about how JPEG works. Do not understand why someone gave it +1 | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 5:29 | comment | added | Steve Barnes | Unfortunately zipping jpegs individually increases the size of them as there is an overhead and they are already compressed. Zipping/targz can save space if you zip a folder full as the wasted space on the disk after each image is saved. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 0:55 | comment | added | Salvador Dali | Thanks for your answer. Please check the edit to my question. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 0:47 | history | answered | Nick Dickinson-Wilde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |